Australia is in crisis. For a number of years, boatloads of people have literally been invading Australian territory, claiming to be refugees. Most of them have come from Middle Eastern or Asian countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran and Pakistan. They claim to have suffered persecution and grave risk of death. Of course nobody can be blamed for seeking a better existence in what is considered to be the best country in the world. However there is a set mechanism for applying to immigrate to Australia and that is, to go through proper channels with the relevant Australian representatives in most countries.
Firstly, here is a humourous and clever video clip that really is not funny at all because everything in it is the unvarnished truth. This is a song that says it all about the disgusting illegal immigrant racket and the huge price that Australia is paying for the idiocy of the Rudd-Gillard Labor government. Watch the clip, then read on.
Putting in bluntly, although some of these people may have suffered persecution in their home nations, by the time they reach Australian territory they are certainly not refugees by any legal or moral criteria. A true refugee fleeing for his life from dangerous circumstances is literally looking for safe haven in the first country that will not persecute him.
Having gained entry to such a place, the person thus automatically relinquishes his refugee status and is then free to apply for legal migration to the country of his choice. This is the international legal situation, as mandated by the United Nations Human Rights Convention.
The true situation with the boatpeople from the Middle East is that they actually land in a number of such safe havens, prior to attempting to enter Australia. The most common route for them is via Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia, none of which have a policy or track record of persecuting or killing them. Therefore if these people arrived in any of a number of safe havens before they departed them for Australia, how can they then invade Australia claiming to be refugees when they could have remained in perfect safety in any of these countries and applied to settle in them? Then eventually if they had wanted to come to Australia, they could have applied to do so legally.
That these illegal immigrants are criminals is very simple to prove. None of them come directly from their home nations where they are being persecuted, but arrive from the last of a series of safe haven nations that they have transited, therefore they deliberately and fraudulently misrepresent themselves as refugees to Australian authorities, thus committing criminal fraud.
Most of these illegal immigrant people arrive in Australian waters with no documentation such as passports, identity cards or any other papers that indicate who they are. There is no doubt that nearly all of them travel by air through a number of countries before reaching Indonesia and the people smugglers. So how did these people pass through so many international air and sea ports with immigration barriers and stay in some of these countries for lengthy periods of time, if they did not have passports and visas?
Figures obtained from the Department of Immigration and Citizenship revealed that more than 80% of the illegal immigrants arriving in Australia by boat threw away their passports before landing, presenting a security nightmare for ASIO and immigration authorities. 5213 people arriving illegally between 2008 and 2010 had first flown to Indonesia before boarding a boat to Australia.
But only 21 of those people still had passports with them by the time they were intercepted in Australian waters. And less than a quarter of them had any documentation at all, raising the danger that people who posed a security risk could slip through the net.
To travel by air, every person must have documentation such as passports and visas. Anybody who has travelled overseas will attest to this. Just see what happens if you try to board an international flight without a passport. Even if you managed to buy a ticket and somehow sneaked past all the outbound checks and obtained a boarding pass, boarded an aircraft and flew out, you would be immediately stopped at your first port of call by the local immigration authorities, who would demand to see your passport and a visa if required.
If you could not produce these documents, they would be arrested immediately. There is absolutely no doubt that especially in these modern times of high security, people without proper documents such as passports and visas would have no hope of travelling from the Middle East through a number of countries to eventually reach Australia.
The inescapable truth is that they these illegal immigrants must have had travel documents so they could transit through all those nations, but most of these bogus refugees deliberately destroyed them prior to entering Australian waters to prevent Australian authorities identifying them and proving that they were either not genuine refugees, or that they had been given entry to a number of safe haven nations, but had deliberately chosen to bypass them and instead engage the services of other criminals, the people smugglers, to illegally infiltrate them into Australia.
Therefore by simple logic and their own deliberate acts to try and conceal their true identities, these illegal immigrants show that they are not refugees but merely criminals. Perceiving that Australia has a far better welfare and social service than most other countries, they target Australia for nothing more than economic reasons and do everything in their power to obstruct Australian authorities in determining their true position. There are also more sinister implications that will be dealt with further in this article.
In November 2013, American writer Luke Mogelson and Dutch photographer Joel Van Houdt gave the first account of what boat people go through to reach Australia. Mogelson's and Van Houdt's journey began in Afghanistan, where Mogelson lives. No people smugglers would agree to take journalists, so they masqueraded as asylum seekers. They were white, so they pretended to be Georgians with sensitive information about their government's activities in the 2008 war. In the event of a search, this explained their possession of cameras and recorders.
An Afghan colleague pretended to be a local schemer and contacted another Afghan in Jakarta, a people smuggler known as Hajji Sahib. He agreed to provide them passage from Indonesia to Christmas Island for the discounted fee of $4000 each. After flying to Jakarta, they were taken to the 23rd storey of a tower block on the northern edge of the city. Here they lived in a flat with an Iranian man, his eight-year-old son and six-year-old daughter.
About 30 more asylum seekers lived in these flats. Most were not Afghans but Iranians from lower middle-class cities, builders, drivers, barbers and shopkeepers who complained about the economy at home and the chokehold on their freedoms. After being delivered by truck to the coast of Jakarta, these people waded into the surf to board open-hulled skiffs that took them to their boat. All but one Afghan man among the asylum seekers were Iranian.
Upon nearing Christmas Island, a crew member used a satellite phone to call Australian authorities for help, before passengers destroyed passports and identity documents and threw mobile phones overboard. Australian sailors subsequently arrived, distributing new life vests, fresh water, bags of frozen tortillas, jars of honey and a tub of strawberry jam. They instructed the crew to restart the boat's engines and continue the voyage under escort.
Is this what real refugees or asylum seekers do? Destroy their passports and identity documents and throw their mobile phones overboard? How many real refugees in those squalid camps in Africa even possess mobile phones? Were these so-called asylum seekers living in those flats in Jakarta that under any sort of threat of persecution or death in Indonesia? Of course not, simply meaning that they were not refugees or asylum seekers at that time and should have never been treated as such by Australia. And if their boat was still seaworthy and the engine worked, why was the boat not turned around and sent back to Indonesia?
This report alone proves that these boatpeople are nothing more than scheming opportunists who deliberately set out to violate Australia's sovereignty and treat Australians as a soft touch to be exploited. This was seen by the fact that the Australians took these bogus asylum seekers to Christmas Island, even though their boat was operable, came from Indonesia and had no permission to enter Australian waters.
And the Indonesians facilitate the scam, all the way to the top of the government, because they allow these people to legally enter and reside in Indonesia until they can be sent on their way to Australian waters. The corrupt Indonesians could stop this racket overnight, but obviously they are making too much money by being involved.
Mogelson's and Van Houdt's eyewitness report merely proves the scam and this is why every single one of those boats full of bogus asylum seekers should be stopped at gunpoint and turned around. And if the people on board decide to scuttle their boats to try and blackmail Australia into rescuing them, well Hotheads believes that Australia has no obligation to rescue people who deliberately want to commit suicide. If a few boatloads of these criminals - and that's exactly what they are - drowned because Australia refused to rescue them and it was publicised that this was Australian policy, then those boats would stop coming overnight.
The most blatant evidence that these boatpeople are not genuine refugees or asylum seekers is the fact that they make the firm choice of flying to Indonesia or Malaysia, then conspiring with criminal people smugglers to put them on boats and sail them into Australia waters. This costs each of these illegal aliens anywhere between $5000 to over $10,000 per head.
The popular notion held by many Australians is that these so-called asylum seekers come by boat because it is cheaper than flying. This is the greatest load of utter nonsense and provably so. It is staggering that Australians can be so gullible and stupid as to believe this, when about ten seconds of pondering the issue would show that the exact opposite is true. And here is the hard evidence.
Consider this. If a person in Iraq, Afghanistan or any other nation in the Middle East area was seeking asylum and had between $5000 to $10,000, the amount of money he would need to pay a people-smuggler, why did this person not simply get on an aircraft from any of those nations and fly directly to Sydney? After all, a one-way airfare from Baghdad to Sydney on EgyptAir was listed as under $1,400 as of August 2012.
But assuming that an illegal alien could not fly directly to Sydney from Baghdad for whatever reason and decided to fly to Jakarta instead, as most of these boatpeople do, that would cost him around $1200 on Turkish Airlines. Having landed in Jakarta, he would then be free to book himself on a one-way flight to Sydney and that would cost him $450 on Malaysian Airlines. The total airfare from Baghdad to Sydney via Jakarta would be under $1,500.
The reason that these illegal aliens prefer boats to planes is because airlines and customs require passports. These people don't conspire with criminals to put them onto leaky boats from Indonesia to Australia because it's a cheaper way to travel. There's a massive difference between $10,000 that an illegal alien would spend to be smuggled to Australia, as opposed to a direct flight costing under $1,500.
The only rational explanation is that these people are not refugees or asylum seekers, because they completely avoid coming to Sydney via the front door, so to speak. They would rather spend up to seven times the cost of that airfare to be smuggled into Australia and that alone makes them criminals, not asylum seekers, not refugees, just nothing but crooks and economic nation-shoppers. That alone is why they should NEVER EVER be allowed to enter Australia, be processed as asylum seekers and use our court system to fight being booted out. Every last one of them should be kicked out of Australia upon arrival and without hesitation.
Virtually all of the illegal immigrants that arrive in Australian waters by boat depart from Indonesia. So how did they get from the Middle East to Indonesia in the first place? The answer is that Indonesia granted them entry visas so that they could fly from Afghanistan, Iraq and other Middle Eastern nations and enter Indonesia legally and reside there until they could embark on their illegal voyages into Australian waters.
Therefore under normal circumstances, Afghans and Iraqis flying into any Indonesian international airport would have to possess valid passports and visas and have onward travel already booked. Otherwise if they just arrived without those documents and proof of onward travel arrangements, they would not even get out of the customs and immigration areas of those airports, but would be detained and deported. So why are they allowed into Indonesia? The answer is very obvious.
The Indonesian regime has always claimed that it is trying to stop the flood of illegal immigrants to Australia, however that is just a blatant lie. In fact, Indonesia is deliberately facilitating the people-smuggling racket by allowing those Afghans and Iraqis to fly into Indonesia in the first place, allowing them to reside in Indonesia until they depart on those boats to Australia and not ensuring that these people depart on the onward travel that is indicated on their itineraries. But why are the Indonesians doing this? Again, the answer is very simple.
There is really only one way to solve this flood of boatpeople from Indonesia and that is for Australia to hold Indonesia responsible for this people traffic. The evidence that the Indonesian government is deliberately facilitating this people-smuggling racket is more than apparent.
The truth is that Indonesia could stop this continuous wave of illegal immigrants from Afghanistan and Iraq instantly, simply by not issuing entry visas to those people unless they could provide hard evidence that they were not coming to Indonesia to engage people smugglers to get them illegally to Australia. Even if the Indonesians did grant entry visas to those people, the Indonesians could monitor them closely and ensure that they depart on flights back to their home nations or to nations that have granted them entry visas, which would mean not to Australia.
But of course the Indonesians will not do any of this, because they are predominantly Muslim and they are part of The Hijra, to facilitate the invasion of secular western nations by Muslims. However, because Indonesia has allowed those Afghans and Iraqis to enter legally, Indonesia has in fact granted them refuge and safe haven, thus those people are really Indonesia's responsibility, not Australia's.
Indonesia has indicated many times that it will not accept the return of those boatpeople and this is something that no Australian politician has the guts to face or to do anything about. In actual fact, Indonesia is legally responsible for these boatpeople and can be held to account over this matter in the International Court of Justice. Indonesia has been getting away with scamming Australia like this for far too long, but Australian politicians have been doing everything in their power to avoid confronting and forcing Indonesia to accept responsibility for this human traffic.
Thus Australia is being overwhelmed by this torrent of illegal boatpeople coming from Indonesia and is spending billions of taxpayer dollars trying to deal with the problem, but does not go to the actual cause of it - Indonesia. Until the Indonesians are forced by law to accept the repatriation of these illegal boatpeople and they stop allowing them to enter Indonesia and organise their illegal passage to Australian waters, then Australia will continue to spend billions of dollars in this futile exercise and the people smugglers and corrupt Indonesian government officials who are being bribed to allow this will continue to scam Australia.
This is why ever single boatperson who is apprehended sailing into Australia from Indonesia should be immediately forcibly returned to Indonesia without any consideration or recourse to Australian courts. The bottom line is that Indonesia is making suckers out of all Australians by being complicit in the conspiracy to flood Australia with Muslims and there is simply no other explanation for what has been going on with those boatpeople coming from Indonesia.
For all the propaganda emanating from Australian politicians about Indonesia being a friend and ally of Australia, this is a blatant lie. Over the years and decades, Indonesia has proven that it is no friend of Australia, from deliberately murdering Australian journalists in East Timor to facilitating the flood of illegal immigrants to Australia. It is high time that Indonesia is screwing Australia in so many ways and to put a stop to it.
Australia gives massive foreign aid to Indonesia. But does Indonesia reciprocate by alleviating problems caused by its people to Australia? Not at all. In 2012, Australia gave Indonesia over half a billion dollars to upgrade Islamic schools - in other words, madrassas that teach Indonesian Muslim kids how to be good little Jihadists. In the meantime, Australian schools were crumbling for lack of funds.
Australia gave Indonesia more than half a billion dollars in foreign aid to upgrade infrastructure and at the same time, Indonesia spent $8 billion to upgrade its military. Australia's military is a joke because of lack of funding, but the idiotic Australian government handed out enormous sums to Indonesia, which allowed Indonesia to boost its military by letting Australia fund the infrastructure that Indonesia should have been funding, instead of spending so much on its military.
Australia gave Indonesia a number of patrol vessels that could be used to intercept and stop the illegal immigrant boatpeople from even leaving Indonesian waters for Australia. What did the Indonesians do? They sent those boats to the north of Indonesia, refusing to deploy them to stop the people smuggling traffic. Australia also gave Indonesia a number of military aircraft. Are they being used to maintain surveillance on illegal boatpeople leaving Indonesia? Not at all.
Australia needs to understand that Indonesia, a Muslim nation, has a vested interest in flooding Australia with Muslim immigrants - it's part of The Hijra, the Muslim Doctrine of Migration. On top of that, Indonesia is making enormous amounts of money by facilitating the people-smuggling racket, so it's a win-win situation for Indonesia. Its politicians make all the right noises to seem as if they are doing something, but they do the opposite, then inform Australia that they will not accept any boatpeople who illegally depart Indonesia, despite their legal obligations to do so.
Australia needs to treat Indonesia as an adversary, not an ally or friend. All foreign aid should be cut off. All donations of hardware such as aircraft or vessels should be stopped permanently. If Indonesia refuses to accept its legal responsibility to repatriate these boatpeople who depart illegally from Indonesia, then Australia needs to drag Indonesia to the International Court of Justice and force Indonesia to do so.
The Australian authorities are doing absolutely nothing to discourage these illegal immigrants from succeeding in their scams. When they are intercepted, Australian authorities process them by transporting them to Christmas Island and performing health and other checks, then sending them to detention centres or even more stupidly, allowing them to live in the Australian community. All this does is play into the hands of the people smugglers, who can literally guarantee that their clients will eventually beat Australia's immigration requirements and live in Australia.
So why are Australian authorities so weak and useless in dealing with these criminals? The answer is that no Australian politician has the guts to stare down the people responsible for this people trafficking and force them to stop. Of course the responsible entity for this is Indonesia, its corrupt politicians and officials and the people smugglers who are paying them off. So how should Australia deal with intercepted boats in order to stop them and put the people smugglers out of business? This is how it should be done.
These methods will stop the boatpeople and the people smugglers in their tracks. However, the big obstacle to dealing with this problem is that Australian politicians are terrified of being called racists and xenophobes and this is why they allow this people smuggling to continue. But is this a valid concern? Of course not. Japan turns away all alleged refugees and asylum seekers at gunpoint and is Japan ever criticised about this? Does Japan even care? Not at all. The same goes for many nations who repel these scammers who prefer to jump immigration queues instead of doing the right thing and applying for legal residence in nations. They don't care about criticism. They understand how the asylum seeker scam works and they refuse to allow themselves to be victims of it.
But the main problem for Australia is that it is a signatory to the UN Convention on Refugees and this idiotic treaty forces Australia to accept anybody who floats into its waters. So this treaty needs to be rescinded as soon as possible, because that will allow Australia to repel these boatpeople scammers at gunpoint if necessary and stop this people trafficking immediately.
Australia is one of only 19 nations in the world that are signatories to the UN Convention On Refugees, which forces Australia to accept and process economic illegal immigrants as though they were genuine refugees, even when it can be shown that these people deliberately bypassed a number of safe-haven nations and conspired with criminals to smuggle them into Australian waters.
People smugglers in Indonesia have latched onto this vulnerability and have been exploiting it to the hilt and making hundreds of millions of dollars by enticing people from the Middle East and other areas to Indonesia, then organising boats to sail them unannounced to Australian waters. These crooks know that because Australia is a signatory to the UN Convention On Refugees, it is obliged to process their claims instead of just turning those boats back to Indonesia.
The UN Convention On Refugees was originally introduced to deal with European refugees after World War Two, a very worthy move, however in 1967 it was expanded to cover refugees everywhere. Most nations realised that if they signed this treaty, they would be exploited, so only a few nations actually participated and unfortunately for them, they have paid a very high price for their stupidity. Instead of being able to assess refugee claimants on their merits and not accepting bogus claimants, those signatory nations are obliged to process all claimants and in many cases, get stuck with them.
Australia will have a problem with this until it gets the backbone to admit that its participation in the UN Convention On Refugees is being wrongfully exploited by criminals,withdraws from this treaty and refuses to accept criminals masquerading as asylum seekers. Australia must take back its right to choose who comes to this nation and ensure that if people claim refugee status, that they really are genuine refugees, not bogus economic immigrants.
The Australian Liberal government very wisely changed its soft policy towards illegal immigrants after the debacle of the Norwegian container ship MV Tampa. This ship rescued over four hundred illegal immigrants from their sinking Indonesian vessel in Indonesian waters and was taking them to the nearest port of Merak, when the captain, having only a very small number of crew to support him, was coerced and intimidated by the illegal immigrants into turning his ship around and sailing for the much further Australian territory of Christmas Island. The truth is that the captain and crew of the MV Tampa, after committing such a heroic humanitarian act by rescuing these boatpeople, were subjected to a blatant act of modern-day piracy by these criminals.
Instead of the world condemning such a despicable crime by these boatpeople, the Australian government was vilified for not allowing them to land on Christmas Island. The reason given for denial of landing permission was very simple and logical. Apart from the fact that the illegal immigrants on board the MV Tampa had committed an act of piracy, they had no right to demand sanctuary in Australia, as they had already been admitted into a number of safe haven countries. But they decided that they preferred to try to illegally infiltrate themselves into Australia.
The Australian government quite rightly stated that allowing such people to land in Australia under these circumstances would show that Australia was weak and would cave in under duress. This would literally give the green light to many thousands of illegal immigrants, whose perception of Australia being a soft target would be reinforced. Thus this particular group were refused landing on Australian soil under any circumstances and rightly so.
In fact, after the problems generated by the MV Tampa, the Australian government adopted a much harder line against illegal immigrants. Apart from pressure being put on neighbouring countries that give such criminals entry and then allow them to arrange to be smuggled into Australia, a naval presence was established to deter or prevent boatloads of illegal immigrants actually sailing into Australian territorial waters. This policy has resulted in a staggering 98% reduction in illegal boatpeople arriving in Australian waters.
Unfortunately, since the Labor Party was elected in November 2007 and retained power with a minority government in 2010, it has reversed the illegal immigration prevention policies of the former Liberal government. In July 2008, those strong deterrents were watered down and as expected, there was an immediate influx of illegal immigrants from the Middle East.
Boatloads of illegal immigrants started arriving in Australian waters and instead of them being asked to show why they bypassed so many safe havens to get to Australian, the government rolled over and agreed to allow them to stay in Australia. One group of 28 illegal immigrants who were intercepted in late 2008 were settled in South Australia and another group of 20 illegal immigrants were intercepted in January 2009 and taken to Christmas Island for processing and they will most likely join the previous illegal immigrants in South Australia.
It appears that the deterrent to these criminal activities has been removed and Australia can expect a horde of Muslim illegal immigrants to add to the infiltration of Australia by people who have no legitimate reason for demanding asylum and residency. The Labor government has again played the Australian people for complete suckers. Not only that, those illegal immigrants have proven yet again that with the connivance of the Australian Labor government, crime really does pay.
Prior to the Australian Liberal Government's crackdown, illegal immigrants resorted to committing despicable acts of emotional blackmail. They deliberately scuttled their boats and endangered their wives and children to force Australian authorities to rescue them and thus become responsible for their welfare - in other words, take them to Australia. The Prime Minister rightly stated that by committing such disgraceful and dangerous acts on their own flesh and blood, these people were certainly not genuine refugees and were not the sort of people needed or wanted in Australia.
The illegal immigrants already in detention in Australia have tried to use physical and emotional blackmail on the Australian government and people by committing acts that could only be described as barbaric. They have vandalised and set fire to their living quarters, abused and assaulted the people who were charged with caring for them, and worst of all, during their hunger strike protests, they sewed up the lips of their own children to put pressure on the government to grant them visas to which they were not entitled. Not only that, a number of their children were sexually molested by some of these illegal immigrants.
Some years ago, the leader of the One Nation political party, Pauline Hanson, was roundly condemned by virtually all other politicians and social leaders for advocating a hard-line policy against illegal immigrants being smuggled into Australia by boat. She stated that such people should be intercepted and if found not to have legitimate refugee status, then they should be turned around and sent back to where they had departed. Ms Hanson was besmirched and defamed by being labelled xenophobic and racist, however it is now very apparent that like so many of her other policies that reflected the desires of the greater Australian community, her stance on illegal immigrants was not racist at all, but quite correct and has now being adopted literally word for word by the Australian government, one of her biggest critics.
A damning Federal Government report the humanitarian settlement program in May 2011 revealed that four out of five so-called refugee households are relying on welfare and more than 60 per cent of those so-called refugees have failed to get a job after five years. A total of 83% of these households of alleged refugees now rely on welfare payments for income.
Not surprisingly, the greatest unemployment rate was recorded among new arrivals from Iraq and Afghanistan, with less than one in 10 able to find full time work and 93.7% of households receiving Centrelink payments. The statistics were contained in a Department of Immigration and Citizenship report.
Those not considered "employed" after five years, were unemployed, retired, studying full time, engaged in caring duties, doing voluntary work or trying to start a business for which they had yet to receive income. More than 60 per cent of those without jobs had a poor command of English.
The study of more than 8500 humanitarian entrants found that of those that came from Afghanistan or Iraq, about 93% relied on welfare payments including unemployment benefits, youth allowance, Austudy or the child care rebate.
This study merely highlights the utter stupidity of the Australian Labor Party's policy of virtually encouraging these illegal immigrants to flout Australia's laws and then become a massive burden on the nation, especially those boatpeople from Afghanistan and Iraq. The hard statistics show that nearly all of them are on welfare payments, can't speak much English, which also makes them unemployable, but they proceed to set up house here and have many children, all funded by the Australian taxpayer.
Of course this is all part of the insidious plan called The Hijra, the Muslim Doctrine of Immigration, which mandates that Muslims migrate to non-Muslim secular western nations and then proliferate, nearly always at the expense of the taxpayers of the host nations, then outpopulate them with the aim of eventually taking control. This is exactly why these boatpeople come from Afghanistan and Iraq, instead of moving to Muslim safe-haven nations close to their home nations.
There should be a very simple set of rules applying to all people who seek to come to Australia as immigrants without having gone through the normal channels. The following tests should be applied and if they fail any of them, entry to Australia would be automatically denied.
In the wake of the attack on the USA in September 2001, the bombing of the London Transport System, the mass murder of Spanish people on the railway system in Madrid and many other instances of mass murder by Islamic terrorists, great consideration has to be given to the influx into Australia of Muslim terrorists posing as illegal immigrants. It was noted that some of the suspects in the US attack had probably been infiltrated into the USA as asylum seekers, therefore Australia must learn a lesson and be most vigilant in not facilitating easy entry to people who may do us irreparable harm in the future.
Not only that, there are many trouble spots in the world today and millions of people are in fear of their lives, not only from wars but from famine and disease. Such people are genuine refugees and should be shown compassion and accorded as much help as possible by any nations that can assist.
On the other hand, the hordes of boatpeople attempting to illegally sneak into Australia are not refugees by any stretch of the imagination. A few may have been when they departed Afghanistan, Iraq, or any of the other trouble spots in the Middle East, however once they arrived in safe haven countries that allowed them entry and did not persecute them, then they should have either applied for residency in those safe havens or applied to the United Nations or the Australian consulate for legal immigration to Australia. However the truth is that the vast majority of them were not even being persecuted in their home countries in the first place and thus could not legally claim to be refugees by any stretch of imagination.
A very interesting scenario has been revealed about many of the so-called refugees and their resources. It was reported in the media in 2011 that the average wage of an Afghan public servant was around $75 per month. It was also reported that Indonesian people smugglers charged around $5000 to $10,000 per person to bring them to Australia. So by the time an airfare from Kabul to Jakarta, accommodation and living expenses in Jakarta are taken into account, an Afghan would really need about $15,000 to embark on being smuggled into Australia.
Simple arithmetic shows that after living expenses are deducted from that Afghan's monthly salary, even if he could save $30 per month, which is highly unlikely, it would take him over 40 years to save that $15,000 - unless he was making far more in some sort of illegitimate activity. This is equivalent to an average Australian wage earner earning $1000 per week saving $2 million, something that very few average Australians manage to do. Therefore it is logical to assume that these Afghan illegal immigrants were being funded by others.
Investigations by Australian authorities have determined that these bogus refugees were certainly not wealthy people, so who paid the huge sums for them to be taken by air from the Middle East, through a number of countries where they needed to be accommodated, fed and supported until they were taken onto boats in Indonesia to be smuggled to Australia?
What might be the real reason why Muslim illegal immigrants travel from the Middle East and Asia through predominantly Muslim safe havens and totally bypass them in their efforts to live in Australia, a Judeo-Christian society. There are a myriad of Muslim nations in very close proximity to Iraq and Afghanistan where these so-called refugees could have found safe haven among their Muslim brethren, eating the food that they were accustomed to and speaking the same language, following the same religion and living under Islamic law, as so many of them have expressed the desire to do in Australia.
These Islamic or predominantly Islamic nations are in the vicinity of Afghanistan and Iraq, from where most of the bogus boatpeople come:
Even when these bogus Islamic "asylum-seekers" get to Indonesia, why don't they stay there, having already been granted entry and residence? Indonesia is a predominantly Muslim nation and those people from Afghanistan and Iraq should feel far more comfortable among their Muslim compatriots, rather than pay a lot of money to be smuggled into the land of the Infidel, Australia?
So why then did these people shun their own Muslim brothers in all those Islamic safe havens nearby and travel halfway across the planet to illegally immigrate to a secular Judeo-Christian nation that is as foreign to them as Mars? It makes absolutely no sense at all, until more information is analysed. Only then, a logical but extremely worrying explanation for this action will emerge.
According to some Islamic websites, it seems that there is a long-term scheme to infiltrate first-world Judeo-Christian nations with Muslims until they out-populate the mainstream societies and then gain political power and eventually assume control and impose Muslim hegemony. This is already been seen to occur in France, Denmark, Germany and other western European nations, where the very quickly growing Muslim enclaves have demanded autonomy, their own courts and their own Islamic-based laws. It is quite apparent that this is happening in Australia and it is obvious that these bogus refugees are being funded by external sources. This is scandalous and smacks of a gigantic conspiracy, but this theory seems to be the only one that makes sense.
This is confirmed by the The Hijra - the Muslim Doctrine of Immigration, a deliberate Islamic policy of Muslim migration to secular western nations, in order for them and their offspring to eventually outpopulate the non-Muslims and then seize power in those nations by sheer weight of numbers. There are intermediate steps that Muslims in secular western nations take to soften up their populations before this happens, such as demands for halal food, sharia-compliant financial transactions and the addition of Muslim holidays to public calendars.
Any actions to suppress them are decried as religious or erroneously, racial discrimination. Demands for separate swimming and gym hours for Muslim men and women, demands for identification photos for licences for women wearing hijabs and refusals to handle pork products or don immodest dress in the workplace have appeared. Demands for special Muslim prayer rooms have been made on many public institutions and many workplaces.
US journalist Janet Levy wrote an excellent exposť of this insidious invasion. The Hijra should be required reading for anybody who doubts that their nation is immune to this invasion and it is available on the Downloads page.
A decade ago, the capital city of Britain was jokingly referred to as Londonistan, but it is certainly not a joke any more. Surveys consistently show that the most popular food is no longer roast beef and Yorkshire pudding, but curry and kebabs. It has been reliably reported in British media that Mohammed is now the most popular name for baby boys in Britain. With the ever-increasing numbers of Muslims either arriving illegally to take up residence in Britain and those already living there that are having huge families that are often being funded by the British taxpayer through the National Health Service, the Islamification of Britain is well and truly under way.
If the people of Australia think that what is occurring in Britain and western Europe could not happen here, they are sadly mistaken, because it is already well in progress, with whole areas of Sydney and Melbourne now resembling third-world Middle Eastern ghettoes, where many non-Muslims are being forced to move out through pressure, unpleasantness and intimidation so that Muslim illegal immigrants can be housed in those localities. Islamic-inspired crimes are now an everyday feature of life in Sydney and Melbourne, with women being pack-raped by Muslim gangs on the basis that they are, in the words of notorious gang-rapist Bilal Skaf, "Aussie whores and sluts" and shootings and terrorist acts by Muslims being commonplace.
These illegal immigrants should be seen for exactly what they are, nothing more than criminals who are attempting to invade Australia for economic and political reasons because this country is perceived as a welfare state with a very soft attitude towards refugees and would also make a very good target for eventual Islamic takeover. They may claim to be genuine refugees, but they are merely crooks who procure the services of other criminals for payment to smuggle them into a sovereign nation.
Illegal immigrants are costing Australia an absolute fortune by abusing our very generous court system. In their attempts to stay in Australia after entering illegally, many of them are fighting their way through the legal process to the High Court, losing, then starting all over again on different grounds. High Court of Australia chief executive Chris Doogan told a Senate estimates committee the process, believed to be a new trend, can take up to two years.
Doogan said such cases proceeded from the Immigration Tribunal to the Federal Magistrates Court, the Federal Court and then into the High Court. "We are noticing a small trend where they will turn up again in another year, 18 months or two years because they have gone back to start the whole process again on a different ground," he said. "They have been through it once on ground one, they have failed and they have had another crack at it on a different ground and again it goes through."
This nonsense has to be completely curtailed. Once there is a determination that a person is an illegal immigrant, that should be the end of the matter and that person should be immediately deported. To allow illegal immigrants, who have broken Australia's laws to sneak into this country, to use valuable resources in a bid to circumvent our immigration policies is insane.
The former Australian Liberal government under Prime Minister John Howard, having had the support of over 90% of the electorate on this issue, virtually adopted the once-vilified immigration platform of One Nation's Pauline Hanson to the letter. It realised that positive steps had to be taken to stem the flood of boatpeople before Australia became totally overwhelmed by them. Australia has a very liberal and compassionate immigration policy, but criminal abuse and blackmail should never be tolerated.
The Liberal government's policy on illegal immigrants, although being literally a hijacked version of the One Nation platform, ensured the overwhelming re-election of John Howard's Liberal and National Party coalition in 2001 and 2004, which only proved even more that this is what the Australian electorate desired and that the government listened and acted. Nobody could accuse the government of not having a mandate to keep illegal immigrants out. Unfortunately, the Labor government under Kevin Rudd has overturned these strict policies and opened the floodgates to illegal immigrants from the Middle East again.
With the fall of the Taliban in Afghanistan and the installation of a more benign regime under the auspices of the United Nations and the free world, it would have been expected that the so-called refugees would return back to that country, now that their prime reason for fleeing has been eradicated. Their reaction to date has been to still claim refugee status, even though they are no longer refugees.
Australia must have the absolute right to control who is allowed to enter this country and live here. It is far too dangerous for Australia to have open borders and accept anybody that decides for whatever reason to arrive and demand to be allowed to remain. There are international mechanisms available to allow prospective immigrants to apply and be processed correctly to determine whether or not they are suitable candidates for residence in Australia. Nobody who manages to bypass such mechanisms and arrives in Australia should ever be allowed to remain under any circumstances. They should be immediately deported to their last country of departure and told to apply properly and legally at the Australian consulate for consideration as immigrants and join the queue and wait their turn.